The nice thing about the Whole Product Dynamic Real World Protection
Test done by AV-Comparatives.org is that you can select the timeframe. The advantage of a 3-month
report is that it better portrays the products’ performances. The top five over the July through September
time period were:
- F-Secure
- Trend Micro
- BitDefender
- G Data
- Kaspersky
The range for the percentage blocked for the top five went
from 99.9% for F-Secure to 99.0% for Kaspersky.
Congratulations to the top five! There
was a bit of a change from the previous three months, when the top products, in
order were from BitDefender, G Data, Kaspersky, QiHoo, and F-Secure. Look for a four month cumulative report from AV-comparatives in November.
Ahnlab and Webroot
repeated their performances in the “why did I participate in this” spots, finishing in the twentieth
and twenty first positions with block rates of 92.5% and 89.8%.
In the battle of the free antivirus software vendors, Avira (95.7% block rate) in
the tenth position topped Avast and AVG Technologies, in that order.
As always, the Whole Product Real World Protection
Test is one test.
Individuals or companies evaluating the ability of products to detect
and capture malware should visit www.av-comparatives.org
, www.virusbtn.com and www.av-test.org
to view the results of other
tests. These organizations use relatively large samples in testing, which improves
the legitimacy of the results. All are
more valid than the number of likes on a Facebook fan page. There is more to product quality than a
number of "likes" on a Facebook fan page.
Webroot isn't fond of most real world tests, commenting in a July blog "Webroot Bulletin Regarding AV-Comparatives Results" that, "Currently most “Real World” tests rely on automation and AV scanners are only given a single chance at detection before the test system is reverted for the next round of testing. Unfortunately this testing model doesn’t give WSA a chance to leverage our unique cloud approach as it has a very static view of the files being tested." They also stated that, "Webroot continues to drive innovation in our products though this isn’t always met with equal innovation in the testing process." To read the complete blog, go to, http://blog.webroot.com/2012/07/19/webroot-bulletin-regarding-av-comparatives-results/
Webroot isn't fond of most real world tests, commenting in a July blog "Webroot Bulletin Regarding AV-Comparatives Results" that, "Currently most “Real World” tests rely on automation and AV scanners are only given a single chance at detection before the test system is reverted for the next round of testing. Unfortunately this testing model doesn’t give WSA a chance to leverage our unique cloud approach as it has a very static view of the files being tested." They also stated that, "Webroot continues to drive innovation in our products though this isn’t always met with equal innovation in the testing process." To read the complete blog, go to, http://blog.webroot.com/2012/07/19/webroot-bulletin-regarding-av-comparatives-results/
About AV-comparatives
www.av-comparatives.org
AV-Comparatives is an Austrian Non-Profit-Organization,
which is providing independent Antivirus software tests free to the
public. Go to their website to view all
the great comparative reports and surveys they publish. In September, they published their File
Detection Test of Malicious Software.
No comments:
Post a Comment