Showing posts with label WebOS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label WebOS. Show all posts

Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Major Moves by Hewlett Packard and CEO Meg Whitman

The sleeping giant is making some moves.  Last Wednesday,    ewHewlett Packard wrote down its investment in its enterprise services division by $8 billion.  To put this in perspective, Electronic Data Systems(EDS), which is part of this group, was purchased four years ago for $13 billion.  
 
The write-down is one of those accounting “things”.  Its recognition that the investment in EDS  was not as great an investment as HP originally thought it would be.  Some would say, “Oh, a major mistake.”  Others would say “market conditions.”  Regardless, it’s a hit to goodwill and an expense to the income statement.  It's  a non-cash adjustment to the balance sheet.  As a result of the charges, Hewlett-Packard said it would report a loss of $4.31 to $4.49 a share when it announces its third-quarter results on Aug. 22.

This week, an  interesting move by by HP CEO Meg Whitman.   The WebOS group is being spun off  as an independent but wholly owned subsidiary.  Its name, Gram.  The tagline - “Potent.  Light.  Nimble.  At the core of all things big and small.”  Gram will be in stealth mode for the next few months.  An open source version of WebOS will still take place in September.
   
My humble opinion is that the market will like the Gram news on Thursday.  It’s not a light move, name notwithstanding! This gives Gram the opportunity to innovate  more quickly than it would if were still in the HP corporate  framework. Not quite a skunk works.   Going against Gram is the fact they’ve lost brainpower over the last several months. Reactions by tablet makers?  They probably won’t make any grand statements.   

August 15 marked day 328 of Meg Whitman’s tenure as CEO.  The stock has dropped   15% since she took over as CEO, hitting a one-year low of $17.41 in early August.  Both the Dow and NASDAQ are up a little over 20% during that time.  Dell has dropped by about 12% over this period.

Whitman  has stated since the beginning of her tenure as CEO September 22  that the turnaround will take time.  These and the layoffs announced   in May are major moves.  She and HP are  not standing still. 

 

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Seminal Moment for Hewlett Packard and Meg Whitman – 27,000 Layoffs Announced


Let the restructuring begin.  ­ For the fiscal second quarter, ending  in April, Hewlett Packard’s profit before some costs fell to 98 cents a share, below  analysts’ 91-cent average estimate.  However, the sales decline of three percent to $30.7 billion topped   the average projection of $29.9 billion.

As part of the earnings announcement on Wednesday, HP stated that it plans a   27,000 workforce reduction (an 8% reduction) between now and October 2014.  This is the largest payroll purge in its 73-year history.  Annual savings from layoffs, retirements, and other measures, will be about $3.5 billion annually.  The job cuts and retirements will pare Hewlett-Packard’s workforce to  349,600.  Among Whitman’s foci for the coming turnaround, delivering the “right products, at the right price, at the right time.”

Many of the cuts will come from the   enterprise services group, which manages data centers and provides technology consulting. This group expanded when Hewlett Packard acquired Electronic Data Systems for $13.2 billion in 2008.  Services demand has slowed, and the division’s profitability has declined amid competition from companies such as International Business Machines Corp.

  "These are never fun but given where H-P is, these are necessarily to get the company back on track," Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu said.  During the reign of Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard, during one economic lull,   employees worked a 4-day workweek with a reduction in pay to maintain staff.  In today’s environment, even they may have had to go for layoffs. 

 “This is quite different from the cost-cutting that Mark Hurd undertook,” Whitman said in an interview.  “This is about fundamental business-process re-engineering.”

Meg Whitman   has said the company needs to make its products and services more competitive and spend more on research and product development.  Under some of her predecessors, Hurd, for example, R&D   suffered as cost cutting was the primary focus.  Brian Marshall, an analyst at ISI Group, said in a research note last month the company ought to spend $4 billion to $5 billion on R&D to compete with IBM and Cisco Systems Inc. in developing new products.  Hewlett Packard had been spending about $3.2 billion annually. 

When Whitman was named CEO in September, HP’s stock was at about $22.80.  It closed on Wednesday at $23.03 and had reached a peak of $29.89 on February 16.  During Whitman’s tenure, NASDAQ has gone up by about 15%.  Not a lot can be read into this, however.

A Brief Timeline of Whitman’s Tenure to Date

  • Aug. 18: HP announces it will discontinue its tablet computer and smartphone products and may sell or spin off its PC division.
  • Sept. 23: HP fires Apotheker after just 11 months and replaces him with Meg Whitman
  • Oct. 27: HP says it will keep the PC division after all. 
  • Dec. 9: HP says that instead of selling its WebOS mobile system or killing it off, it will make it available as open-source software that anyone can use and modify freely.  HP says it still plans to develop and support WebOS
  • Feb. 22, 2012: Whitman urges investors to be patient and talks of a "multiyear journey" for a turnaround. 
  • March 21: HP says it will combine its PC and printers businesses.  The move will save an unspecified amount of money.   
  • April 11: Estimates from research groups Gartner and IDC suggest that HP has regained much of the PC business it had lost during the period of indecision.  Now about those tablets they sold for $99 when they said that they were thinking of discontinuing that business….
There will be uncertainty over the next few months as Whitman and had team decide in more detail where the cuts will be during this restructuring.  About a third of them will be in the United States.  The analysts will probably in general  be positive with the move.  Layoffs and reinvesting in R&D is nothing new.  These are typical turnaround Bain type activities, where both Whitman (and Romney), spent part of their careers.   

Nothing   has been said how acquisitions may play a role in the turnaround. While R&D will increase, growth via acquisition can make sense for certain deals to get into a business or plug a gap in a product line quickly. Part of Apotheker’s demise was his decision to (way) overpay for the Autonomy acquisition.  Hewlett Packard had been investing more heavily in security and making security acquisitions.  This will continue.

When Whitman accepted the CEO position,   she moved out of the “executive offices” and into a cubicle on the floor with other employees.  This is more in keeping with the culture that Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard had for the company. You didn’t see this during the Carly Fiorina era.

Meg Whitman isn’t getting a huge salary for her efforts.    In a recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission HP wrote that  Whitman received a salary of $1, about $16.1 million in stock options, and $372,598 in "other compensation," including use of the company aircraft.
 

 

 

Sunday, March 18, 2012

The Meg Whitman Era at Hewlett Packard - Six Months In

March 20 Addendum - Hewlett Packard Meg Whitman plans to combine the computing giant's PC and printing divisions in a major internal overhaul intended to spur combined sales of hardware to customers


The most recent move is intended to reap the synergies of two divisions whose hardware products are often sold side-by-side, said the second source familiar with the plan. (From Reuters)


Sounds like reductions in force ..... No economies of scale in manufacturing. No economies of scale in R&D. Do people need to upgrade their printer when they get the latest and greatest PC or laptop?


Still a B-


Original Post


Meg Whitman has now been CEO of Hewlett-Packard for six months. The scorecard? Probably a B-. It’s virtually impossible to make radical changes in 180 days unless your strategy is slash and burn. And that’s not what HP requires. HP is a $48 billion market cap firm with over 300k employees globally. This will take awhile. Whitman is saying two years.


Threats facing HP Whitman has pointed out include - PC sales are slowing as more people buy smartphones and tablets. The high-profit ink business is slipping as customers store photos on Facebook (or other sites) instead of printing them at home. HP is selling fewer high-end servers after archrival Oracle (ORCL) stopped making software for those systems.


Some immediate decisions needed to be made, quickly, when Whitman accepted the CEO position. She already was on the board. From a perception perspective, Whitman moved top executives out of their offices and into cubicles instead. This rings of the “old HP”, which is a good thing. This wasn’t seen during the Carly Fiorina era!


HP is keeping its $40 billion PC division. However, growth is projected to be in tablets. In this area, Apple has the lead over all other competitors. Tablet sales, driven by sales of Apple’s iPad, grew 274.2% to 63.2 million units last year — most of them iPads, according to tech tracker Canalys. Sales of desktop computers grew 2.3% to 112.4 million units; notebook sales grew 7.5% to 209.6 million units; and netbook sales fell 25.3% to 29.4 million units.


“PCs remain key tools for everything from video editing, music mixing, and spreadsheet crunching to thoughtful missives,” according to James Mouto, general manager for of HP’s personal computer business unit. “And if you’re sending Junior off to college, the first computing product needed for homework is a PC.”


http://www.forbes.com/sites/briancaulfield/2012/03/07/hp-responds-to-apple-your-college-kid-still-needs-a-pc/


WebOS is going open source in September, when Open WebOS 1.0 is scheduled to be released. 500 WebOS employees were let go last September. 275 of the remaining 600 employees were released in late February.


For the stock quants - the stock price is up a little over 7.4% at $24.49 (March 16) since Whitman took the CEO helm. This is far below the 52 week high of $43.28 in March 2011. Competitor Dell is up 24% and the Dow is up 23% over the same period.


HP also has heavily invested in security. This includes acquiring security management company ArcSight for $1.2 billion in 2010. This is also an area Dell has chosen to invest in. Last week they announced that they were purchasing SonicWALL®, Inc. a provider of intelligent network security and data protection solutions. They are acquiring SonicWall from private equity investor firm Thoma Bravo for an estimated price of $1.2 billion.


http://kensek.blogspot.com/2012/03/dell-to-acquire-sonicwall.html


It should be an interesting next 6 months for Whitman as she works with the rest of management to turn HP around. Her salary? $1. Yes, there are incentives and stock options.


http://www.mercurynews.com/business/ci_20201896/whitman-steadies-hp-but-big-challenges-remain

Wednesday, November 09, 2011

Time for Hewlett Packard to (wo)man Up on the WebOS Deal

After moving over from a board member position to take on the CEO role on September 22, Meg Whitman and Hewlett Packard moved relatively quickly on deciding what to do about their $40 billion plus PC/laptop division. They hedged their bets and decided to keep it around for a while. Must have been a difficult choice! Admittedly, margins are slipping in this business.

The next burning issue on the plate is what to do with Palm and WebOS. This acquisition took place in spring 2012 to the tune of about $1.2 billion. Then in the intervening months, Hewlett Packard, introduced a tablet, decided to get rid of the tablet and have a fire sale, and then decided to keep the tablet around for a while with an OS from Microsoft. So much for my decision to use these tablets as coasters.

For the time being, Whitman and Hewlett Packard have decided to do “nothing” about WebOS. Do nothing is always easier and much more reversible than sell. It doesn't rank high on the daring scale, though. A couple of potential suitors, including Oracle(?) have been mentioned.

It probably makes no sense to have two tablets running on two different OS’s. That’ll confuse the public and the investor marketplace. Assuming HP’s fiscal year is the same as the calendar year, they have less than two months to sell the company (if that’s their decision) and let it hit the 2011 books.

Great article on “Behind the Woes at H.P., Wall St. Banks Lurk”.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/11/07/as-h-p-shops-its-bankers-do-very-nicely/

According to the article, it turns out that Hewlett Packard has paid out about $81 million in fees to investment bankers related to the acquisitions they have made over the last two years.

That’s how much Hewlett-Packard is estimated to have paid out in fees to its investment bankers in the last two years for advising it on a series of acquisitions including ArcSight and 3Par (premium of 242%!). According to the article, Hewlett-Packard’s market value has fallen by more than $40 billion during this period of time.

With respect to the decision to keep the PC division, “The costs and the risks of separation are simply greater than any value we could create,” Ms. Whitman said by way of explanation.

Meanwhile, the shareholders are losing out. One redeeming thing about the above; Whitman is taking a base salary of $1 for the upcoming year. Any further pay will be in bonuses and stock appreciation.