The three reports were issued in early November.
- Huawei AP7110 WLAN Access Point Rate/Range Performance Evaluation vs. Cisco Aironet 3602i AP. Document 212142
- Huawei AP6010 WLAN Access Point Performance Evaluation vs. Cisco Aironet 3502i AP. Document 212143
- Huawei AR G3 Series Enterprise Routers GbE and 10GbE Forwarding and IPsec Throughput. Document 212140. This document isn’t a competitor comparative document. The report measures performance of four of Huawei’s routers.
These are valid reports. Quite concise. Tolly explains in detail the test methodology results. Vendors work with Tolly on the test plan defining what they wish to be tested. The results “are what they are”. If the vendor is unhappy with the report, the report may never be see the light of day.
So why would a vendor commission these studies? Third party validation. Bandwidth.
Tolly may find it easier to get assistance from a third party if they
have technical questions. Cisco didn’t
appear to have been involved with these tests.
From the test report, “In accordance with Tolly’s Fair Testing Charter,
Tolly personnel invited representatives from Cisco Systems to review the
testing. Cisco did not respond to the
invitation to participate in the evaluation and review the test plan.”
According to Tolly Group, over 65% of the Fortune 100
utilize Tolly reports. A huge number of reports are available for free
to registered users. www.tolly.com http://www.tolly.com/AboutUs.aspx
No comments:
Post a Comment