PC World didn’t provide numerical scores in the write-ups. PC Magazine and Neil Rubenking did in his write-ups. None of the above company’s paid products were included in AV-Test’s May/June test of corporate solutions. The Virus Bulletin VB100 testing results were for those tests done in 2011 and 2012. The Avast fail was in 2011. The AVG Technology fails were in 2011 and 2012.
The Virus Bulletin RAP Averages Quadrant doesn’t show
numerical scores. If you eyeball the
three vendors compared with one another, Avira,
Avast, and AVG Technologies come in first, second, and third. AVG Technologies and Avast have test reports on
the ICSA and West Coast Labs websites. These reports aren’t for the free
products.
You can scroll through this site for more detailed blogs on
test results of the organizations. As
always, it’s best to go to the test organization web sites for the detailed
write-ups. Retentive reader alert - awards, logos, and certifications can end up
on a vendor’s site nowhere near the product that was actually tested and/or stay posted
for a few years. Just sayin…..
Posts
1 comment:
Thanks for such social platform which give us variety of idea to explore ourself technically .This exposure give benefits to everyone to fit or to survive in global market which is very essential in the global era.
Post a Comment